Town Board - Regular Meeting

TOWN OF CLARKSTOWN TOWN BOARD REGULAR MEETING Town Hall Auditorium July 22, 2025 at 7:00 PM MINUTES

PRESENT: Supervisor George Hoehmann Councilman Mark Licker Councilman Michael Graziano Councilman Donald Franchino Councilman Robert Axelrod Town Clerk Lauren Wohl

ABSENT: The Supervisor George Hoehmann declared the Town Board meeting opened. Assemblage saluted the flag. The Town Clerk read the roll call. POLICE DEPARTMENT MATTERS A member of Clarkstown Police Department Administration will report.

PUBLIC COMMENTS REGARDING AGENDA ITEMS AND GENERAL

PUBLIC COMMENTS Steve Levine, Congers Mr. Levine was questioning the Town's purchase of property at 49 Waldron Avenue, Nyack. He would like to know what type of property this is. It appears to be a small parcel. He is also interested in how the Town is paying. What is the municipal purpose for this property? He is curious as to when the warehouse across the street will be completed.

He does see that the shell to the building is up. Al Osterlitz, New City Mr. Osterlitz is questioning regarding SRO Agreements with BOCES, CCSD, Nanuet, and Nyack. Why is there a disparity in Police Officers Pay per School location? He is also asking about #4. It is being bonded for Town Buildings - energy related improvements. He would like to know what the energy improvements are?

Item #5 - Energy related playground equipment. He would like an explanation. It is also being bonded. He is concerned. He also would like an explanation on #8 - the shaded structure that is being built at the West Nyack Hamlet Green. Maybe the Town can plant trees instead. He believes this would be cost effective. He would like an explanation for #9 as well. Mr.

Osterlitz would like to know who the Authorized Purchasing Agent is for the Town? In regards to #28 and #29 he would like to know what the DBA is, instead of the LLC? He stated that the Town spent $500,000 for a machine that was going to take care of the overgrowth at Congers Lake. He believes the overgrowth is getting worse. Emily King, New City Ms.

King has heard complaints from residents that the Playgrounds that the Town has created are too hot. She understands that is why the Town is possibly adding shading. She believes that when you approve a design for a playground, this should be taken into consideration. The Supervisor stated that he believes she is incorrect on this. He will have a conversation with the Department of Engineering Facilities Management.

He is not going to allow people to come up and state things that are not true. The Town has not had any complaints regarding this. The Supervisor stated that he is at the West Nyack Playground almost every day. He stated that there are dozens, if not hundreds of people in that park. This was a swamp and the Town received millions of dollars to renovate and build a playground. There were no existing trees.

As part of the project, we put in trees but they are not mature enough. That is why shade equipment is needed. One of the things we did while getting the Federal and State funding, is create a path around the back of the property. The Town will add pavement to be able to make it easier for people who use medical walkers. This is the largest expense.

There will be shade like structures that we have at our Town pools that we will add. The Town planted a bunch of trees there as well. He wants the record to be clear. After clarification, Ms. King is glad to see that the Town is putting shade funds up. She just wants to make sure that shade is included in future initial designs. Ms. Sanchez, New City Ms.

Sanchez is wondering if there is a way to have Auxiliary Police stationed at each of the Town's pools (especially Holidays). There are always incidences there, with violence. People sneak alcohol into the pools and this becomes difficult for the Town staff to work and deal with all of these issues. The Supervisor asked the Chief of Police if there were any incidences at any of the pools. Ms.

Sanchez said there was a particular incident on July 4th. The police responded and the people were asked to leave. Ms. Sanchez stated that if there was a police presence at the pools, it would not escalate to problems. The Supervisor stated that they are reevaluating the guest policy. None of the problems were Clarkstown residents. They were guests of residents. Steve Lasky, 63 Schriever Lane, New City Mr.

Lasky is following up from the last Town Board Meeting regarding the 55 Schriever Lane proposal. The Supervisor requested that the neighbors reach out to County Executive Ed Day and the County Legislature. They had a meeting and from that meeting, Mr. Day stated that he would kill the project if we as a community wanted it killed. From some research, we are not sure that is the best course of action.

If we kill it, is there any chance the Town would purchase the land for a park? With all the other building going on around that street, we are wondering this. We only have Zuckor park in and around Schriever. This is the center of the building development that is proposed. He knows there is a bill at the State level that could be a game changer. He would like the Supervisor to explain this.

Would the Board be willing to work for certain accommodations for the neighborhood? We are not here to argue. We are here to try to work this out the best way possible. The Supervisor apologized and stated that he did not mean to come across as disrespectful. Tim Cunningham, 64 Schriever Lane, New City Mr. Cunningham is echoing Steve's comments regarding the park.

Three major site developments are going up right in this area. 169 Main Street, Decicco's and Calliber Tires. He asked about the traffic study that was performed recently at the intersection of Schriever Lane and Main Street. Was that was a valid traffic study? Why was it performed when schools were out and everyone was on vacation? That would not be a true traffic study. Also, at the abandoned bank at 219 S.

Main Street - there are two dozen tires dumped in the back of that bank. Joe Trizinno, 5 Bontecoe Lane, New City Regarding all the housing proposals that are being addressed as possible housing for Main Street, New City - H1, H2, H3, H4 Developments - As a resident of the Town. Isn't there enough traffic on Main Street in New City? Isn't there enough going on?

Why are we considering changing our environment, our traffic, and our community? Why are we pushing for this type of development in our neighborhood? It states luxury Town Houses, Affordable Housing - The Golf Course will raise their head if these projects go forward. They were pushing this a year ago. He works at Sunrise Assisted Living and making a left out of that development is troublesome.

The traffic (before any of this development is being performed) is completely out of control. He is questioning Why? He wants to know how the Town feels about all of this development? When you see this massive amount of development all at once, you have to wonder. The Supervisor stated that anyone can propose anything. They have to get approval. Some things have been proposed. Some, they have moved forward on.

Some, they have not. An example - we have not heard from Schriever Lane since they came to TAC. Anyone that owns property has property rights. If it fits into the zone, they can develop it. Most of what Mr. Trizinno is talking about is not before the Town. Example: Schriever Lane is not before the Town.

It is the Supervisor's understanding that once the County Executive stated that they will kill the Schriever Lane Project, the developer walked out of the room. Kevin Conway, Town Attorney - Applicants have a right to come into any of the Boards and request things that they think they are entitled to. Only at that time would the Boards take a look at the requests and proposed projects and make a determination.

When that happens, the Public has a right to come out and speak against it. The Boards do not prejudge. If you were a homeowner or a property owner, you would not want - in advance - a Board to commit being against the project. The Supervisor stated that if he were to prejudge the project, and the owner applies and does not get an approval, they sue.

They end up getting their approval because we prejudged and the court orders it. We then most likely will be paying their legal fees too. There is case law to prove this. Kevin Conway, Town Attorney, makes sure that does not happen. We do not want the Town to get sued. There is no application before the Town Board or the Planning Board regarding Schriever Lane. Everyone has property rights.

Matt Kanecty, Valley Cottage He attended the Rockland County meeting. He does not remember anyone walking out of the meeting. It was more of the County vowing not to appeal for a zone change for land that they were going to be purchasing with ARPA funds.

He was hoping that as you discuss this development, you can discuss the Town Plan and some of the other Building projects that involve affordable housing, and the overall structure that you have been working towards. Co. Licker wanted to add that he was at the County meeting and what he heard was not that the County Executive was going to kill it.

He wanted to hear from the community and if the community is clearly against it, then he will kill it. He made no representation that this was going to happen. The Supervisor asked Mr. Gillies to speak regarding this. Mr. Gillies and Mr. Simoes attended the County Executive meeting. Mr.

Gillies: On two occasions - this was stated: If it is clear that the neighbors were against this project, the County will not do anything that the neighbors were against. The Supervisor stated that Mr. Simoes, Town Planner, knows who the developer is. He relayed to the Supervisor - before the meeting was over, the representative for the developer got up and walked out. Mr.

Gillies stated that he did not personally witness that, but Mr. Simoes relayed that to him. The Supervisor stated that the Town Planner stated "they walked out". They have not contacted the Town since then. The Supervisor's understanding, from this project, is that the County is going to buy the property for six million dollars, using ARPA funds. Then they will have an agreement with the developer.

The Developer will be getting an additional two and 1/2 million dollars in subsidies. This property, for 30 plus years, the owners tried to sell. No one wants to buy this property because the value is not there. If the County is not going to fund six million dollars, the Supervisor does not believe this is a viable project in any way, shape, or form.

Based on an additional conversation the Supervisor had in passing with the County Executive Ed Day, (at the Rockland Business Association), Mr. Day stated - if the people do not want it, we will not fund it. The Supervisor stated that this is the first time he is hearing that the community may consider something. What is it going to be?

The Supervisor does not believe this is a viable project without significant subsidies - otherwise it would have been developed already. There are plenty of people that want to purchase property and develop single family housing. The open space committee that the County Executive, Ed Day, was a member of, took a look at this and decided not to purchase. It was already evaluated by the Town 30 years ago.

Nobody thought it would be valuable enough to develop. The Supervisor also stated that we really have not looked at the land for a park. Maybe we should? He does not know how residents would feel about a park, with a playground in a residential neighborhood. If you are going to do a park, you would have to make it assessable....maybe walking trails?

The Town could take a look at that We are all looking to work together, but there is no proposal currently before the Town. After that meeting, they never came back. The Supervisor asked the Town Planner today - "Have you had any contact with the developer?" His answer is no. Therefore there is no development proposal before us to consider. Also, this is not a zone change. They are looking for 17 houses.

They can possibly build them as a standard plan or they can cluster them into Town Houses. The only time the Town Board will get involved is if they cluster them, they will need the Town Board to say yes. Town Board could say no, then they can develop 17 houses there. The deal as the Supervisor understands it, is what his staff has communicated to him.

There is a significant subsidy that the County has allocated of ARPA funding, to put affordable housing on this property. The County Executive has indicated at the meeting with the residents, and to the Supervisor...."if the residents do not want it, they will not support it." The Supervisor continued - So what are the alternatives? The alternatives are if someone is not getting $6 million to buy the property...

do the math. A typical building lot in Rockland County is $250,000-$300,000. Seventeen building lots into $6 million comes out to be $353,000. It is over market. The Supervisor does not see the property being developed. What can it be? The Supervisor can have Mr. Simoes get in touch with everyone from the neighborhood and go through what can go there. It can be a single family neighborhood.

We have a law in the books that does not allow Houses of Worships, Mosques, Church or different types of Commercial establishments in residential neighborhoods. We do not allow them on Town roads. Schriever Lane is a Town road. These types of uses would be prohibited. Could somebody sue? Yes, they could. It would probably be a 5-10 year legal battle. It could be single family housing.

Our law has been challenged once before...and our Law survived. The Supervisor stated that he understands why people are concerned - as they should be. At this point there is no proposal and there is nothing to react to. People have property rights. Be careful if you want to have a park there. The park would need access for everyone. We can not limit it.

We created a bunch of parks while he was Supervisor in the past 10 years. The West Nyack playground, Zukor was redone, picket ball, community centers, pools, walking trails, Bear Swamp nature reserve and more. We will look at it. The Supervisor wants the Town Planner to get the residents together and go through the Town Code and what is there. If people have a change of heart...

however, it was the Supervisor's understanding that it was universal that everyone is against the project. That has been relayed to him. The Rapkin family has owned this property for generations. They have tried to sell it or develop it for generations. They have not had a buyer until the County stepped up with $6 million.

If someone from the Town is telling you that there are buyers for this property, he wants to know about it. If the resident does not to reveal his source(s), they should have a discussion with the Town Attorney. The County authorized $6 million to buy the property. The vote was passed in the legislature. There is money authorized for this.

He does not know who is going to spend $353,000 or more per acre because that is what the owners have accepted. To kill a deal of that nature, there are legal consequences. If someone is giving false information - that there are other buyers out there? This can cause legal consequences. Let's be clear. He is asking the Town Attorney to investigate this. It will be handled confidentially.

The Town Attorney stated that is exactly why this whole discussion is inappropriate. It is just gossip. The Supervisor stated that he is not aware there is a counter offer. The County Legislature passed a resolution authorizing $6 million in funding to buy this property. That is why the project was going forward in the first place. To Mr. Cunningham: There was a Town Traffic Study performed.

They would have to meet certain matrix. The Supervisor does not know the particulars of this study. This would have to be brought up with the Planning Board. He believes there may have been a safety study. He will get back to him regarding this. The Supervisor stated that there are a lot of development projects out there now.

What is in development right now is the 47 units across from the gas station on North Main Street. The County is looking to sell the Sain Building. That will be 47 units. The Supervisor was approached by the County Legislature to up the density of the Sain Building. The Supervisor refused to do this. We take our Zoning very seriously. We have award comprehensive plans that we are proud of.

We get hundreds if not thousands of people's input. The Town allows for more density in downtown and less density as you leave the center of the Town. ShopRite owns Evergreen Street - Across from Town Hall. They want to put 100 units of housing there behind the shopping center. A certain number of those (possibly 10%) need to be affordable units. This is coming before the Planning Board this week.

The 47 units across the street has already been approved. There is another project of 75 units behind the Chase Bank building. This will probably come through too. There have been talks of others but nothing else has gone through. All of these require traffic studies. All traffic lights up and down New City - traffic lights are not in sync. The Town is talking to re-sync all the lights.

This will improve traffic in New City. Computer generated cameras are going to be used. We applied to Senator Schumer for a major grant. We can do better. We are looking to improve every light in the Town of Clarkstown (57). This will improve safety and traffic flow. The only zone change in the near future will be the Golf Course. Every ten years there is a Comprehensive Plan that gets reviewed.

When you make a proposal for a development, you need to apply to SEQRA and are required to follow all guidelines. Unfortunately, we suffer because the West of Rockland County is over developing. To Mr. Osterlitz: Chris Wagner, Deputy DEFM spoke regarding the shell of the building which is built.

The bid authorizes the purchase of materials for the build out (interior - office space, bathrooms and break room for the Personnel that will be staffed there). We are anticipating $40,000 for the cost of the build out). To Mr. Levine: The Supervisor stated that the Town received about $1.25 million dollars to build a park in Central Nyack.

The Town acquired one piece of property, a small house which has already been purchased. This is the adjourning house which is on the corner. Central Nyack is one of our Hamlet Centers. We have a community center there and it desperately needs a park area. There will be ample shade. We will be adding a playground. Through some good grant writing, we received the funds to build a Spray Park and a Playground.

Once we acquire the property, we will tear down the building, and proceed with the construction. To answer the questions regarding Res. #353 - Res. #356. The Police Chief Wanamaker spoke regarding his questions. The Chief gave a brief history of the School Resource Officer (SRO) history. Schools were looking for safety. This program started throughout the Country.

A formula was developed - for Clarkstown North, South, Felix Festa, Nanuet and Nyack schools. The Schools felt like they needed more coverage. The formula increases with the Salary increases. There are two at North, two at South and two at Felix Festa (the second request was the School's request). This varies from district to district. Nyack only has one.

If Nyack requests a second SRO, they would have been charged $125K. Boces is in Clarkstown too. All of this needs to be considered. Congers Lake was delayed about tow months with a permit to apply a chemical application. It was delayed by NYS. You will see remarkable improvement as each application is applied every two weeks. There will be four more applications this year. This is an organic based chemical.

It will kill things, but it will not kill the wildlife. Co. Graziano added that we were not using the machines, because there were many complaints that the fish and wildlife were being killed. The best time to treat the lake is when the fish are not spawning. Regarding Res. #339 through Res. #345. These are just Bid advertisements for the Highway Department vehicles.

Raquel Guzman and Rob Berdy from Purchasing work on Bid advertisements. The state came into the Town and did a Risk Assessment Review. The Supervisor asked the Deputy Town Comptroller, Mary Maloney, how we did on that review. Ms. Maloney responded - we had a very good review. They specifically came in looking at the Purchasing Department and the Payroll.

They also went through Capital Projects, met with every Town Department as well as the Department Heads. It was a glowing review. Our Purchasing Department received stellar comments. Rob Berdy, the authorized Purchasing agent for 15 years. The woman from the State Comptrollers office, who has doing these Risk Assessment for 16 years, stated that she never NOT recommended a full audit. This was the first time.

We were pleasantly pleased. The Supervisor stated that we received a clean bill of health. Regarding Res. #333 and Res. #334 - Ms. Maloney explained that last April, the Town authorized 9 million for these projects through Siemens. The three components are: the lighting $1.6 Million, building improvements was $5.1 Million, and the playground for $2.8 Million.

This is reallocating the funds because the scope of the playground came down drastically from what was originally thought. The Town would now like to use the money for building improvements. Its transferring the funds. It is not adding to the Town's debt. It is just to change the purpose of the funds. The Playground was less. Siemens made it known that with these projects, the Town will save X amount of dollars.

They have to stand by that, If this does not happen, and Siemens does not meet the benchmarks, they will have to pay us.

RESOLUTIONS

AGENDA ITEM #1: RESOLUTION No (330-2025) - Accepting the Town Board Meeting Minutes of June 24, 2025 and Special Town Board Meeting Minutes of July 8, 2025 — Adopted

AGENDA ITEM #2: RESOLUTION No (331-2025) - Amending the Budget — Adopted

AGENDA ITEM #3: RESOLUTION No (332-2025) - Authorizing the Supervisor to Accept a Grant from New York State Division of Cemeteries for Maintenance of Abandoned Cemeteries — Adopted

AGENDA ITEM #4: RESOLUTION No (333-2025) - Authorizing Amending Bond Resolution Adopted April 9, 2024 Financing Costs of Energy Related Improvements to Town Buildings at the Cost of $6,410,000 ($6,410,000 Serial Bonds Amending Previous)

AGENDA ITEM #5: RESOLUTION No (334-2025) - Authorizing Amending Bond Resolution Adopted April 9, 2024 Financing Costs of Energy Related Playground Improvements at Cost of $1,522,000 ($1,522,000 Serial Bond Adjustment Amending Previous)

AGENDA ITEM #6: RESOLUTION No (335-2025) - Authorizing the Town to Purchase Property Located at 49 Waldron Avenue, Central Nyack for General Municipal Purposes (Purchase Amount: $720,000)

AGENDA ITEM #7: RESOLUTION No (336-2025) - Authorizing the Financing of the Costs of the Acquisition of a Parcel of Land Located at 49 Waldron Avenue, Central Nyack ($735,000 Serial Bonds)

AGENDA ITEM #8: RESOLUTION No (337-2025) - Awarding Bid 10-2025 -- Playground Park Shade Structure at West Nyack Hamlet Green Including Associated Sitework, Sidewalks and Paving of Walkways (Total cost: $240,825.00 plus a 18% contingency (Serial Bonds))

AGENDA ITEM #9: RESOLUTION No (338-2025) - Authorizing the Financing of the Costs of Improvements to West Nyack Hamlet Green ($285,000 Serial Bonds)

AGENDA ITEM #10: RESOLUTION No (339-2025) - Awarding Bid #12-2025 -- Purchase of Vehicles for the Clarkstown Highway Department — Adopted

AGENDA ITEM #11: RESOLUTION No (340-2025) - Advertising Bid #14-2025 -- Hereford Drive Culvert Improvements — Adopted

AGENDA ITEM #12: RESOLUTION No (341-2025) - Advertise Bid #15-2025 -- Construction Materials for Warehouse at 40 First Street, New City, NY — Adopted

AGENDA ITEM #13: RESOLUTION No (342-2025) - Awarding Bid #15-2025 -- Construction Materials for Clarkstown Warehouse at 40 First Street, New City, NY (Tortal not to exceed: $50,000.00)

AGENDA ITEM #14: RESOLUTION No (343-2025) - Advertising Bid #16-2025 -- HVAC Upgrades for Gymnasium at Pascack Community Center — Adopted

AGENDA ITEM #15: RESOLUTION No (344-2025) - Advertising Bid #17-2025 -- HVAC Upgrades for Office Area at Central Nyack Community Center — Adopted

AGENDA ITEM #16: RESOLUTION No (345-2025) - Advertising Bid #18-2025 -- HVAC Upgrades for Office Area at Zukor Community Center — Adopted

AGENDA ITEM #17: RESOLUTION No (346-2025) - Authorizing Capital Expenditure for the Purchase of Materials for Drainage Improvements on Demarest Mill Road, West Nyack (Total: $40,000.00 (Serial Bonds))

AGENDA ITEM #18: RESOLUTION No (347-2025) - Authorizing the Financing of the Costs of Drainage Improvements on Demarest Mill Road in West Nyack ($40,000 Serial Bonds)

AGENDA ITEM #19: RESOLUTION No (348-2025) - Authorizing the Director of the Department of Engineering and Facilities Management to Retain the Services of a Pool Contractor and Purchase Pipe Replacement Materials for Lake Nanuet (Total combined cost not to exceed: $23,508.50)

AGENDA ITEM #20: RESOLUTION No (349-2025) - Authorizing the Director of the Department of Engineering and Facilities Management to Retain the Services of Nemc 2, Inc for the Replacement of a Commercial Hot Water Heater and Circulator Pump at Germonds Park (Total cost not to exceed: $24,995.00)

AGENDA ITEM #21: RESOLUTION No (350-2025) - Accepting Deed for Road Widening, Accepting Deed for Lot 3, and Accepting a Stormwater Control Facility Maintenance Agreement Domnic Properties, LLC Subdivision (44.7-2-17.1, 17.2, and 17.3 f/k/a 44.7-2-17) — Adopted

AGENDA ITEM #22: RESOLUTION No (351-2025) - Amend Resolution No. 116-2025 Authorizing the Purchase of Seating and Related Upgrades for the Auditorium at Town Hall (Total Amount of $180,385.13)

AGENDA ITEM #23: RESOLUTION No (352-2025) - Accepting Deed for Road Widening Sirois Subdivision (44.15-1- 38) — Adopted

AGENDA ITEM #24: RESOLUTION No (353-2025) - Authorizing the Supervisor to Enter into an Agreement with the Board of Education of Rockland BOCES for the School Resource Officer Program for the 2025-2026 School Term — Adopted

AGENDA ITEM #25: RESOLUTION No (354-2025) - Authorizing the Supervisor to Enter into an Agreement with the Board of Education of the Clarkstown Central School District for the School Resource Officer Program for the 2025-2026 School Term — Adopted

AGENDA ITEM #26: RESOLUTION No (355-2025) - Authorizing the Supervisor to Enter into an Agreement with the Board of Education of the Nanuet Union Free School District for the School Resource Officer Program for the 2025-2026 School Term — Adopted

AGENDA ITEM #27: RESOLUTION No (356-2025) - Authorizing the Supervisor to Enter into an Agreement with the Board of Education of the Nyack Union Free School District for the School Resource Officer Program for the 2025-2026 School Term — Adopted

AGENDA ITEM #28: RESOLUTION No (357-2025) - Granting Permission to Wanna Sip, LLC to Dispense Alcoholic Beverages at the New City Street Fair — Adopted

AGENDA ITEM #29: RESOLUTION No (358-2025) - Granting Permission to Wanna Sip, LLC to Dispense Alcoholic Beverages at the Clarkstown Rotary Club Street Festival — Adopted

AGENDA ITEM #30: RESOLUTION No (359-2025) - Accepting the Resignation (by Retirement) of Laura Gilroy - Principal Account Clerk - Comptroller's Office, Accepted and Retroactive to July 19, 2025 — Adopted

AGENDA ITEM #31: RESOLUTION No (360-2025) - Appoint Jason DiSalvo (Permanent) (NY Helps Program) to the Position of Coordinator Dispatch Related Services - Police Records, Effective and Retroactive to June 18, 2025 (No increase in salary.)

AGENDA ITEM #32: RESOLUTION No (361-2025) - Appointing Tara Hayman, (Permanent) (NY Helps Program) to the Position of Assessing Clerk I - Assessor's Office, Effective and Retroactive to June 18, 2025 (No increase in salary.)

AGENDA ITEM #33: RESOLUTION No (362-2025) - Appointing Harold Straut (Permanent) (NY Helps Program) to the Position of Chief Fire Safety Inspector - Building Department, Effective and Retroactive to June 18, 2025 (No increase in salary.)

AGENDA ITEM #34: RESOLUTION No (363-2025) - Appointing Stanley Francois to the Position of (Temporary) Police Officer - Clarkstown Police Department (While Attending the Police Academy), Effective August 25, 2025 ($63,203/annual)

AGENDA ITEM #35: RESOLUTION No (364-2025) - Appointing Ryan Hennelly to the Position of (Temporary) Police Officer - Clarkstown Police Department (While Attending the Police Academy), Effective August 25, 2025 ($63,203/annual)

AGENDA ITEM #36: RESOLUTION No (365-2025) - Authorizing the Installation of One (1) W1-2R Curve Sign with a W13- 1P 15mph Speed Plaque, and W1-8L Chevron Arrow Plaques on Old Phillips Hill Road, New City — Adopted

AGENDA ITEM #37: RESOLUTION No (366-2025) - Authorizing the Installation of Two (2) R2-1 15mph Speed Limit Signs with S4-3P School Signs on Phillips Hill Road, New City — Adopted

AGENDA ITEM #38: RESOLUTION No (367-2025) - Authorizing the Installation of One (1) S1-1 School Advance Warning Sign with a W16-9P Ahead Plaque on Phillips Hill Road, New City.Adopted

AGENDA ITEM #39: RESOLUTION No (368-2025) - Authorizing the Installation of One (1) R2-1 15mph Speed Limit Sign on Phillips Hill Road, New City — Adopted

AGENDA ITEM #40: RESOLUTION No (369-2025) - Authorizing the Installation a Pedestrian Crosswalk and S1-1 Pedestrian Crossing Signs with W16-7P Diagonal Arrow Plaques on Phillips Hill Road, New City — Adopted

AGENDA ITEM #41: RESOLUTION No (370-2025) - Authorizing the Installation of a Commemorative Plaque to Street Sign, Maple Avenue, New City, New York, in Memory of New City Volunteer Firefighter Kevin Landau — Adopted

ADJOURNMENT At 8:25 PM, the Supervisor made a motion to close and adjourn this Town Board Meeting. This was offered by Co. Axelrod, seconded by Licker. All were in favor. Respectfully Submitted Lauren Marie Wohl - Town Clerk UPCOMING MEETING Next Town Board Meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, August 19, 2025 at 7:00 p.m.